Lean evidence record
Dilworth’s Theorem: Lean evidence
This technical record binds the exact theorem statement to its commit-pinned Lean source, checker results, assumptions, and publication-review status.
Line counts exclude blank lines; comments and documentation count. The total is the commit-pinned first-party Lean import closure; Mathlib and other third-party dependencies are excluded.
Exact recorded Lean statement
The declaration this evidence supports
theorem dilworthTheorem : DilworthTheoremStatementTechnical evidence record
Source identity, checker results, and assumptions
- Main Lean declaration
dilworthTheorem- Source commit
56a5eacbfd70
Mechanical evidence
How Lean checked the proof
These fields support the exact Lean declaration, not a broader informal claim.
- Artifact ID
artifact.known-dilworth-theorem.endpoint.v001- Declarations covered by recorded evidence
AtlasKnownTheorems.DilworthTheorem.dilworthTheoremAtlasKnownTheorems.DilworthTheorem.DilworthTheoremStatement- Lean build
- passed
- Recorded build time
- 4.3 s one machine-dependent evidence run, not a benchmark
- Evidence collected
- · clean-source provenance recorded
- Unfinished proof check
- passed
- Lean toolchain
leanprover/lean4:v4.29.1- Recorded source commit
56a5eacbfd70c6e6a05b23003f9aad9936fb9f6e- Source SHA-256
sha256:4e4eb174e65cd22cfbad5e0d39d71b56996c9fc8b6d123171a0bc1856fb6a993- Statement alignment
- accepted
Lean foundations
Standard foundations used by the proof
Lean reports the logical foundations below through Mathlib. They are standard proof-system foundations, not conjectural mathematical assumptions about this theorem. The recorded closure stays within the approved classical_mathlib_standard profile, with no unexpected axiom or unfinished-proof placeholder.
Classical.choiceQuot.soundpropext
Files and machine-readable evidence
Reproduce or inspect the recorded check
Use the complete first-party source bundle for reconstruction, or inspect the exact main file and checker evidence separately. Mathlib and other third-party dependencies are identified but not rebundled.
Review bindings
Publication reviews accepted
All four required publication-review gates are accepted for the retained presentation of this exact theorem. The review bindings are recorded separately from the Lean build and do not broaden the formal statement.
Read the publication-review details